The father of a 10-year-old girl who was killed in the carnage at Uvalde, Texas Elementary School, and one of the school’s staff have taken the first steps that could lead to a lawsuit against Daniel Defense, the manufacturer of the semi-automatic weapon used in killing 19 children and two adults, writes Reuters.
Alfred Garza’s lawyers, Amerie’s father Jo Garza, a 10-year-old student killed at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, have asked in a letter to gun maker Daniel Defense to provide information about the company’s marketing policy to children and adolescents. .
“We ask you to provide us with this information now, so as not to oblige Mr. Garza should open a process to obtain them “, it is shown in the mentioned letter.
No lawsuit has been filed against the company in connection with the carnage in Uvalde.
Salvador Ramos, 18, the perpetrator of the massacre, legally bought his first weapon on May 17, when he turned 18.
Garza’s lawyer, Josh Koskoff, had a similar lawsuit following a 2012 shooting incident at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, which resulted in a $ 73 million compensation deal with the manufacturer. Remington weapons in February. This was the first significant deal – after a mass shooting incident – with a weapons manufacturer, who are protected by a federal lawsuit against lawsuits.
The lawyer told Reuters that he would apply what he learned from the “Sandy Hook” case, focusing on marketing to children and teens and placing products in video games. shooter.
“By the time he turned 18, the assailant knew exactly what weapon he was buying,” Koskoff said.
In a separate lawsuit, Emilia Marin, an employee of the Uvalde school, filed a lawsuit in a Texas court, trying to force Daniel Defense to hand over documents related to marketing policy. Emilia Marin appears on the school’s website as a speech therapist.
Gun manufacturers are generally protected against lawsuits for the criminal use of their weapons by a federal law, called the Law on the Protection of the Armed Trade in Arms (PLCAA).
However, in 2019, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that Remington Arms could be sued by the families of Sandy Hook School victims, with the exception of PLCAA, because the company allegedly violated state marketing laws.
America is in shock after a new massacre at a school in Uvalde, Texas. 19 children and two adults were killed by an 18-year-old man, who was shot dead by police. The boy had bought weapons for his birthday. Before leaving home, he killed his grandmother. He then entered a primary school, where children between the ages of 6 and 10 study, and opened fire at random.
Editor: Bogdan Pacurar
#father #student #killed #Uvalde #initiates #action #weapon #manufacturer #United #States #arms #companies #protected #law